Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67930 (KAR)

SMT MUTHAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8798/2023 · 2025-12-17

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53801 WP No. 8798 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 8798 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUTHAMMA W/O B K SEENAPPA @ CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/AT KEDAMULLORE VILLAGE AND POST VIRAJPET TALUK, S KODAGU - 571 218. NOTE- PEITITIONER IS SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ADEESH P, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SACHIN B S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SHO, VIRAJPET RURAL POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SRI. SHIVAPPA B C S/O B K SEENAPPA @ CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT KEDAMULLORE VILLAGE POST, Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53801 WP No. 8798 of 2023 VIRAJPET TALUK, S KODAGU - 571 218. 3. B S JEEVAN S/O SHIVAPPA B C, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT KEDAMULLORE VILLAGE POST, VIRAJPET TALUK, S KODAGU - 571 218. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1; R2 - SHIVAPPA B, SERVED; R3 - B S JEEVAN, SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE TO EXTEND THE POLICE PROTECTION TO THE PETITIONERS SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS PER THE ORDER DATED 07.04.2022 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO. 401 OF 2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53801 WP No. 8798 of 2023 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 17.12.2025, which reads as thus: “The Advocate for the Petitioner respectfully submits that OS.No.48/2019 on the file of Prl. Civil Judge at Virajpet, which was filed by the Respondents came to be dismissed and the Counter Claim filed by the Petitioner herein came to be abated. Hence, the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous. Under such circumstances, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the writ petition as infructuous in the interest of justice and equity”. 2. The memo is accepted and taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38