IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (264) Om Parkash State of Haryana CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. submits before been rendered infructuous. 2. been rendered infructuous. March 20, 2025 Manpreet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Om Parkash Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Viney Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Addl. AG, Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Arnav Goel, Advocate for Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. Respondent No.5 in person along with Mr. Chander Shekhar Singhal, Advocate. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits before this Court, that the prayer made in the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Consequently, the instant writ petition is been rendered infructuous. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19034-2024 Date of Decision : 20.03.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Addl. AG, Haryana Respondent No.5 in person along with Mr. Chander Shekhar Singhal, Advocate. learned counsel for the petitioner fairly this Court, that the prayer made in the instant writ petition has Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No fairly this Court, that the prayer made in the instant writ petition has dismissed as having MANPREET SINGH 2025.03.21 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment