16.25apeal etc (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 16 OF 2025 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS PRATAP JAGNNATH KARHALE ….. Ms A. S. Mantri, APP for Appellant/State Ms H. R. Lomte, Advocate h/f Mr M. V. Salunke, Advocate for Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 116 OF 2025 PRATAP JAGNNATH KARHALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ….. Ms H. R. Lomte, Advocate h/f Mr M. V. Salunke, Advocate for Appellant Ms A. S. Mantri, APP for Respondent No.1/State WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3037 OF 2025 IN APEAL/16/2025 SUPRIYA SANTOSH PAWAR AND ANOTHER VERSUS PRATAP JAGNNATH KARHALE AND ANOTHER ….. Mr U. L. Telgaonkar, Advocate h/f Mr N. U. Telgaonkar, Advocate for Applicants Ms H. R. Lomte, Advocate h/f Mr M. V. Salunke, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Ms A. S. Mantri, APP for Respondent/State ….. 2025:BHC-AUG:31011 16.25apeal etc (2) CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 12 NOVEMBER 2025 P. C. : 1. Ms Lomte, learned Advocate holding for Advocate Mr Salunke for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.116/2025 states that the appellant is expired and therefore, these matters are abated. Ms Bhosale, learned APP and Mr Telgaonkar, learned Advocate for victim also do not dispute the said position. 2. In view of the above, all these matters are disposed of as abated. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk