IN TH 212 Amit Kum Neha Sing CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate Be and others disposed of State to the of the petit consequent be passed from the d petitioners to them for COCP-2784-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2784 o Date of decision t Kumar and others Versus Singh, IAS, Deputy Commissioner, AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Ankur Sheoran, Advocate Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 04.3.2024 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-244 others vs. State of Haryana and others sed of on the basis of statement made to the effect that “…an appropriate s petitioners for the grant of minimum uential benefits keeping in view the sed by the competent authority with the date of receipt of copy of thi ners are found entitled for any relief fortnight otherwise, due reasons w 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2784 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-25.03.2026 …..Petitioners ioner, Kurukshetra …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA vocate for ocate dl. A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 244-2021 titled as “Amit Kumar others”, whereby the petition was t made by learned counsel for the ate speaking order on the claim mum pay-scale alongwith other the settled principle of law will within the period of 08 weeks f this order and in case, the elief, the same will be extended ns will be given in the speaking VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.25 18.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order. Lea be allowed and they w subject to t remains sa the petition 04.3.2024 15.1.2021 h the petition are not enti State, no f contempt p disposed o take recour March 25 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2784-2025 (O & M) Learned State counsel further subm wed to continue in service till the ey will not be replaced by the sim t to the conditions that the work and s satisfactory so as to entitled them At the very outset, it is submi petitioners that in compliance of th .2024 all arrears except for the pe .2021 has been paid to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the resp etitioners have not worked for the sai ot entitled for pay of the said period. In view of the statement made , no further directions is required to empt petition. Accordingly, the pre osed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, Needless to say that the petitio recourse to the appropriate remedy as 5, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 submits that the petitioner will the work of the said post exist e similarly situated employees and conduct of the petitioners em to continue in service…” submitted by learned counsel for of the Writ Court order dated the period from 03.12.2020 to ners. e respondent-State clarifies that the said period and therefore they t made by learned counsel for the ired to be passed in the present e present contempt petition is if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. petitioners would be at liberty to dy as per law, if any. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.25 18.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document