ANKUSHI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/5929/2025 · 2025-06-03
Deepak Manchanda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67911 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67911 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-W-803-2025 in/and CRWP-5929-2025 Date of Decision: 03.06.2025 ANKUSHI AND ANOTHER .....Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, DAG, Haryana. * * * * * DEEPAK MANCHANDA, J. (Oral) CRM-W-803-2025 Allowed, as prayed for. CRWP-5929-2025 The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing respondents No.2 and 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners, who are residing under live-in-relationship at the hands of private respondents. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Sanjay Kumar, P.S. Chandhut, Distt. Palwal, submits that the private respondents have already made a statement before the police authorities that they have no objection with regard to the relationship of the petitioners. In view of the above statement made by learned State counsel, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition, the same is
disposed of as infructuous.
(DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 03.06.2025 sandeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.06.03 14:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.