R. KISHORE KUMAR, GUNTUR DIST. v. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER (OPERATIONS) & ANOTHER
WP/7224/2007 · 2025-05-08
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6791 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6791 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI t WRIT PETITION NO: 7224 OF 2007 Between: R. Kishore Kumar, S/o. R. Poul, aged 44 years, Occ. Unemployee R/o. Presently R/o. Pedakurapadu Village & Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The Superintendent Engineer (Operations), Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2. The Divisional Engineer (Operations), Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., Chittoor.. ...Respondents J I Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the-name of the Petitioner for appointment in the available vacancies in Southern Power Distribution Company of AP Limited, Operation Circle, Tirupathi, Chittoor District in the category meant for BPMS No. 36, dated 18-05-1997 while issuing the Letter D.No. 823/06, dated 01-02-2006 of the 1st Respondent as illegal, unconstitutional and against the to the principles of natural justice arbitrary. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP. NO: 9223 OF 2007) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
f pleased to direct the respondents to consider the name of the petitioner for appointment in the available existing /future vacancies in Southern Power Distribution Company of A.P. , Ltd., Operation Circle, Tirupati, Chittoor District as per the priority fixed [n BPMS no. 36 dt.18-5-1997 during the pendency of the writ petition before this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI fiCHINNAPA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent: KISHORE SAMINENI (SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following: Order
APHC010064562007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT \ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 7224/2007 Between: R. Kishore Kumar, Guntur Dist. ...PETITIONER AND The Superintendent Engineer Operations Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.BCHINNAPA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1 .VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL
2.
KISHORE SAMINENI (SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following:
ORDER Sri M.Ravikanth Reddy,
learned counsel, representing Sri B.Chinna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that cause in this writ petition does not survive and the writ petition can be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR assistant registrar //TRUE CC ^Tofficer To, SECT!
1. One CC to SRI B CHINNAPA REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI VENKATA APSPDCL Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to SRI KISHORE TRANSCO) Advocate [OPUC]
4. Three CD Copies RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR SAMINENI (SC FOR AP gsg
HIGH COURT DATED: 09/05/2025
ORDER WP.No.7224 of 2007 rd 2 5 JUL 2025 Co • ivC!!ir«iitSecBQ|i^»5' DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS