Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67907 (KAR)

SRI.T.S. SURYANARAYANARAO, v. D.B.GANGAIAH

CCC/867/2025 · 2025-11-11

C M Poonacha

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45840-DB CCC No. 867 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 867 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI.T.S. SURYANARAYANARAO, S/O LATE H.N.SRIKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT THATTEHALLI VILLAGE, HALEBEEDU HOBLI, BELURU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573211 2. SRI.T.S.RAMESH S/O LATE H.N.SRIKANTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT THATTEHALLI VILLAGE, HALEBEEDU HOBLI, BELURU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573211. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. G.V.NARASIMHA MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. D.B.GANGAIAH Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45840-DB CCC No. 867 of 2025 THE DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS BELUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU-560 002 …ACCUSED (BY SMT NAMITHA MAHESH, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED HEREIN FOR DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THIS HONBLE COURT DATED 22.04.2025 IN WP NO.4991/2025 AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45840-DB CCC No. 867 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The complainants have filed the present complaint alleging willful disobedience of an order dated 22.4.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.4991/2025 (KLR-RES). 2. In terms of the said order, the accused was directed to conduct hadbast and survey and to consider the representation of the complainants for conducting hadbast and survey. 3. Learned counsel for the accused submits that the relevant records are not available. Therefore, steps have been taken for reconstruction of the records. In the meanwhile, an endorsement to the said effect has been issued. 4. In view of the above, we are unable to accept that there is any willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court. 5. The complaint is, accordingly, closed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE ND/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27