p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.8381 of 2025 M/s Subas Nutrition Private Limited, Jagatpur …. Petitioner Mr. Gopal Prasad Jena, Advocate -versus- M/s Employees State Insurance Corporation, New Delhi and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Amarendra Prasad Ray, Standing Counsel Along with Mr. N.D. Tripathy, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 09.07.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 07. 1. The matter having been listed for hearing under the heading for admission is mentioned by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the Opp. Parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner files memo of date enclosing copy of the letter dated 01.12.2025 issued by the Regional Director, Employee’s State Insurance Corporation (Ministry of Labour & Employment, Government of India), Regional Office, Odisha, Bhubaneswar indicating amnesty scheme. The said letter is scanned and reproduced herein: Digitally Signed Signed by: RAJESH KUMAR BADHEI Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 10-Jul-2026 18:29:19 Signature Not Verified p. 2 Memo shall be taken on record. Scanned copy be updated. 3. The learned counsel for the opposite parties endorses the submissions made at the bar by the p. 3 learned counsel for the petitioner regarding the letter dated 01.12.2025. 4. In view of the above developments, it is expected that the parties shall work out amicable settlement acceptable to both the parties as per the Amnesty Scheme and this Court in no uncertain terms encourages such settlement in view of the Amnesty Scheme dated 01.12.2025. The parties shall work on the Amnesty Scheme dated 01.12.2025 and arrive at a settlement. 5. It is further clarified that contentions raised in the writ application shall not be bar in any manner whatsoever for the parties to work out amicable settlement in terms of the ‘Amnesty Scheme’. Interim order, if any, passed earlier by this Court shall merge with the order passed today. Any order passed earlier shall not in any manner come in the way of the parties to arrive at a settlement. 6. The writ petition is disposed of along with all pending I.As., with the observations as made above. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Rajesh