IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 136 Charanjit Singh State of Punjab and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner who had applied against the post of Librarian under the Physically Handicapped Category pursuant to Advertisement No.33 of 2021, had obtained 47 marks in the written examination which were highest in the said cat tentative selection list at Sr. No.382 counseling on 02.0 (Annexure P6) category available. has been served, however, the same has yet not evoked any response. He thu instructions, prays that a direction same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 2. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to t decide the legal notice dated Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his free to seek legal redress thereupon 01.07.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17109 Date of decision: 01.07.2025 Charanjit Singh Versus State of Punjab and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. DS Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel submits that the petitioner who had applied against the post of Librarian under the Physically Handicapped Category pursuant to Advertisement No.33 of 2021, had obtained 47 marks in the written examination which were highest in the said category and consequently his name figured in the tentative selection list at Sr. No.382 (Annexure P5) counseling on 02.01.2025, however, in the final list issued on 04.01.2025 (Annexure P6), it has been mentioned that there is no cand egory available. In this regard, a legal notice dated has been served, however, the same has yet not evoked any response. He thu instructions, prays that a direction may be given to me in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to limited prayer made. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to t decide the legal notice dated 20.02.2025, within a period of Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 17109-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.07.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner who had applied against the post of Librarian under the Physically Handicapped Category pursuant to Advertisement No.33 of 2021, had obtained 47 marks in the written examination egory and consequently his name figured in the (Annexure P5) and was even called for .2025, however, in the final list issued on 04.01.2025 it has been mentioned that there is no candidate in the said , a legal notice dated 20.02.2025, Annexure P7 has been served, however, the same has yet not evoked any response. He thus, on given to the respondents to decide the me in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to , within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Learned counsel submits that the petitioner who had applied against the post of Librarian under the Physically Handicapped Category pursuant to Advertisement No.33 of 2021, had obtained 47 marks in the written examination egory and consequently his name figured in the and was even called for .2025, however, in the final list issued on 04.01.2025 idate in the said 20.02.2025, Annexure P7, s, on to decide the me in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the he respondents to months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be ASHOK KUMAR 2025.07.01 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document