Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:6116] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2144/2025 Veeru @ Birendra S/o Mukesh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kheda, Police Station Chhipabarod, Presently Ratanpura Road, Chhipabarod, Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Chhabra, District Baran.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/02/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.491/2024 registered at Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 189(2), 126(2) & 115(2) of BNS.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that none of the injuries sustained to the injured has been opined as dangerous to life. Counsel submits that cross- cases have been registered between the parties. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2025. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruit purpose.
[2025:RJ-JP:6116] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2144/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. He submits that still investigation is going on and there is clear allegation against the petitioner to cause knife injury on the neck of the victim/injured.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the fact that investigation is still going on; gravity of offence, I do not find it a fit case to allow this bail application, at this stage.
5. Accordingly, this bail application stands dismissed. However, observations made herein are only decision of this bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J LALIT MOHAN /213