Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67869 (KAR)

OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR v. NIL

OLR/8/2020 · 2025-12-04

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50825 OLR No. 8 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR REPORT NO. 8 OF 2020 BETWEEN: OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR ATTACHED TO THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CORPORATE BHAVAN, NO.26-27, 12TH FLOOR, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 …APPLICANT (BY SMT. KRUTHIKA RAGHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR OL; SRI. AKHILESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRADYUMNA NARASIMHA, ADVOCATE FOR VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATOR) AND: NIL …RESPONDENT THIS REPORT OF THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR IS FILED UNDER SECTION 497(6) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 TO RESTORE THE STATUS OF THE COMPANY FROM THE 'UNDER LIQUIDATION' TO 'ACTIVE'. THIS REPORT OF THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATORS ARE LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50825 OLR No. 8 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Smt.Krutika Raghavan, counsel for the Official Liquidator and Sri.Akhilesh, counsel on behalf of Sri.Pradyumna Narasimha, counsel for the voluntary Liquidator appeared in person. Smt.Krutika Raghavan, counsel for the Official Liquidator seeks time to comply with the office objection. This court is not inclined to grant time. OLR is filed in 2020. It is almost 5 years, efforts are not made to comply with the Office Objection. Hence, OLR is dismissed for non- compliance of Office Objection. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35