2025:HHC:10189 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2255 of 2025 Date of Decision: 10.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Manvinder Singh …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No. 1-State. Mr. Piyush Rathore, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4. Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No. 5. Mr. Surinder Kumar Saklani, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file representation to respondent No. 5, praying therein for his adjustment at some other station. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Learned counsel for respondent No. 5 is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer and fairly states that representation, if any, filed by the petitioner shall be considered and decided sympathetically. 3. Consequently, in view of above, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to file representation to respondent No. 5 within a period of one week, which in turn shall be decided expeditiously, preferably, within a period of ten days. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall take sympathetic view. Applications, if any, stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 10, 2025 (Sunil)