Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67859 (KAR)

R PAUL JAYENDER v. ROBERT RAJU

RFA/1561/2023 · 2025-09-17

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39360-DB RFA No. 1561 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1561 OF 2023 (MON) BETWEEN: R. PAUL JAYENDER S/O A. RAJAVELU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT. CHINNAMPALLI VILLAGE YADAMARI POST AND MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH-517 422 ALSO AT: NOBLE PHOTO STUDIO No.121, NAGAWARA BUS STOP THIMME GOWDA BUILDING NEAR MARUTHI MEDICALS ARABIC COLLEGE POST BENGALURU-560 045 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VASANTH MADHAVA S., ADVOCATE - (ABSENT)) AND: 1. ROBERT RAJU S/O BALAKRISHNA DAS AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT No.259/7 RAMAKKA COCONUT GARDENS MAHESHWARINAGAR BENGALURU-560 048 Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39360-DB RFA No. 1561 of 2023 2. PHILIPS AJU S/O LATE P. ALBERT AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT No.1639, 'E' BLOCK AECS LAYOUT, OPP. BROOKE FIELDS KUNDALAHALLI BENGALURU-560 037 3. SMT. KINI PHILIPS W/O PHILIPS AJU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT No.1639, 'E' BLOCK AECS LAYOUT, OPP. BROOKE FIELDS, KUNDALAHALLI BENGALURU-560 037 …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.04.2023 PASSED IN OS No.1737/2022 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39360-DB RFA No. 1561 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) There is no appearance for the appellant. 2. Till today, office objections are not complied. Therefore, in view of the peremptory order dated 10.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required. 3. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PN List No.: 4 Sl No.: 15