Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6785 (CHH)

ARJUN RAM LODHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/911/2025 · 2025-01-31

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:5757 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 911 of 2025 1 - Arjun Ram Lodhi S/o Shri Girdhari Lodhi Aged About 67 Years R/o Bandhwapara, Arvind Nagar, Purana Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Live Stock Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur, (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Veterinary Services, New Raipur District- RaipurC.G. 3 - The Joint Director Veterinary Services Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, C.G. 4 - Manager Govt. Poultry Farm Koni Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur C.G. 5 - Joint Director Treasury, Account And Pension, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :- Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For State :- Mr. Rishabh Bisen, P.L. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 31.01.2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authorities to give benefit of leave encashment within stipulated time to the petitioner with interest, in the interest of the justice. 10.3 That, any other relief which the Hon'ble Court may deemed fit and proper also be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice. ” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that deceased wife of the petitioner was retired employee of the respondent department, who was working as work charge employee in the Respondent Department. He submits that in the light of judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No.3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.) and other connected matters decided on 30.09.2022, the deceased wife of the petitioner was entitled for leave encashment. 3. Learned State counsel submits that sufficient documents have not been filed by the petitioner and it is also not reflected as to whether the deceased wife of the petitioner has completed the minimum period of the service to avail the benefit of leave encashment. 4. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents available in record. 5. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on the merits, this 3 petition is disposed off giving liberty to the petitioner to make detailed representation before the concerned respondent / competent authority within the period of ‘30 days’ from the date of receipt of copy of this order with all necessary documents to substantiate his claim. In the event of filing of representation, on due verification, if the deceased wife of the petitioner is found to be similarly situated persons, as in the case of Faguvaram Patel (supra), his claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of judgment of Faguvaram Patel (Supra) expeditiously preferably within the period of ‘90 days’ from the date of submission of the said representation. 6. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed off with aforesaid observations and directions. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha