S RAMANJINEYULU @ SAI GARI RAMANJINEYULU v. THE STATE OF AP
CRLP/1405/2025 · 2025-03-28
K Suresh Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6784 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6784 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Z,I €>5 < lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR rr FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH, -_-'' _I I"''''v'''\ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.-1405 OF 2025 Between : G/ /-. 4 s.RamanjI'neyulu @ Sai Gari Ramanjineyulu, s/o sal' Gari Bala Narayana, Aged about 41 years, R/o D.No.5-52, RaJ-aka Street, Tadipatrj, Ananthapuram DI'StriCt. ...PetI-tl-Oner/Accused No.3 AND The State ofAP, Rep. by the public prosecutor, Through s.H.O, Punganur Police Station, chI'ttOOr DI'StrI'Ct. ...Respondent / / I petjtI-On under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 (u/s 438 of Cr.P.C), is filed praying that I.n the circumstances stated l'n the grounds filed jn support of the criminal Petl-tjon, the High Court may be pleased to release the petl'tioner/Accused No.3, on bail I-n the event of his arrest in connection with crI'me No.29 of 2025, on the file of Punganur poll-Ce Stall-On, Chittoor Dl'strl-ct. The petjtl-on coming on for hearl'ng, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed Ion support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri T.V.Jaggi Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner and of public prosecutor for Respondent, the court made the following
sAPHCO10065442O25 E]±lE] lN THE HIGH CAOTUAPIA?RFAAvNADTTRA PRADESH (Special OrI-ginal Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1405/2025 Between : S Ramanjineyulu @ Sai Gari RamanJ-ineyulu The State of A.P [3239] ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.TVJAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the foIIowinq ordeLr: Accused No.3 in Crime No.29 of 2025 of Punganur PolI'Ce Station, Chittoor District, filed the present criminal petition seeking anticipatory bail. The said crime was registered for the offences under Sections 316(5),318(4),336(3),61 (2)(a) read with 3(5) BNS. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant is the Regional Business Head of Kanaka Durga Finance Limited. The said company is involved in granting secured loans. During the course of business, the customer is used to pledge gold and obtain loan. lt is the duty of the Branch Manager by name Syed Khaza, who used to appraise the gold. During the coui±se--of verl-fication, it was found that c=*#szzred
\ some of the gold articles are not pure gold ornaments. On the basis of ~/ it, a crime has been registered against the petitioner and others.
According to the de facfo complainant, the petitioner is a chartered accountant of the Kanaka Durga Finance Limited. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the role of the petitioner is only to see the accounts of the company. So far as verification is concerned, it is the duty of the Branch Manager Gum appraiser. As such, no role has been attributed to the petitioner except stating that he is a chartered accountant of the company. 4. ln view of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions: i) ln the event of the petitioner/A-3 being arrested, the Station House Officer, Punganur Police Station, Chittoor District, is directed to release the petitioner on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer, Punganur Police Station, Chittoor District. ii) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required, and he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. * _---
To,
5. Accordl'ngly, the crI-niinal Petl't,-on is allowed. As a sequel thereto, mI®SCellaneous petitl-ons pendI'ng, jf any, shall stand closed. SD/- p.VINOD KuMAR I\C>®\--. +-_ ASSISTANT' R /ITRUE COPY// TEAR SECTION OFFICER
1. The slat,Ion House officer, punganur police station, chjttoor DistrI-Ct. 2. One cc to SRI T.V.JAGGI REDDY, Advocate [opuc] 3, Two cos topuBLIC PROSECUTOR, High court of AP., Amaravatl'. [ouT]
4. One spare copy. PSD
JTr
L- \ HIGH COURT KSB'J DATED.. 28/03/2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.1405 of 2025 ALLOWED \\®.- ..-...-.T* -I,1f.