IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (231) FAO No. 7335 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.07.2025 Sanjiv Kumar …Appellant Versus Kala Ram and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Umesh Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. None for respondent No.3. **** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) 1. As per report of the Registry, appellant has been served. However, no one has put in appearance. 2. Further, information was duly given to learned counsel for respondent No.3 but no one has put in appearance. 3. Since the appellant has chosen not to appear despite service, there is no option but to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE July 03, 2025 Rekha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No REKHA SHARMA 2025.07.04 05:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh