CWP-16314 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (249) Raghbir Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the respondent No.2, to take complaint/representation dated 18.04.2022 (Annexure P petitioner. 2. representation (supra), preferred by the petitioner, this Court deem appropriate, to dispose of the instant writ petition, with a mandamus upon the respondent No.2, to decide the representation (supra), made by the petitioner, within a period of two months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order/judgment. 16314-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Raghbir Singh Versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. J.S. Johal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Amandeep Singh Sidhu, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 7. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the respondent No.2, to take immediate necessary action, on the complaint/representation dated 18.04.2022 (Annexure P At this stage, without observing anything on the merits of the representation (supra), preferred by the petitioner, this Court deem appropriate, to dispose of the instant writ petition, with a mandamus upon the respondent No.2, to decide the representation (supra), made by the petitioner, within a period of two months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of er/judgment. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16314-2023 Date of Decision : 08.04.2025 …Petitioner ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI , AAG, Punjab Mr. Amandeep Singh Sidhu, Advocate Through the instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the immediate necessary action, on the complaint/representation dated 18.04.2022 (Annexure P-14), made by the At this stage, without observing anything on the merits of the representation (supra), preferred by the petitioner, this Court deems it fit and appropriate, to dispose of the instant writ petition, with a mandamus upon the respondent No.2, to decide the representation (supra), made by the petitioner, within a period of two months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of Through the instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the immediate necessary action, on the , made by the At this stage, without observing anything on the merits of the s it fit and appropriate, to dispose of the instant writ petition, with a mandamus upon the respondent No.2, to decide the representation (supra), made by the petitioner, within a period of two months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of MANPREET SINGH 2025.04.08 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-16314 3. 4. respondent No.2, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties concerned. 5. April 08, 2025 Manpreet 16314-2023 Consequently, the instant writ petition is It goes without saying that such a decision shall be taken by the respondent No.2, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties concerned. Ordered accordingly. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 Consequently, the instant writ petition is disposed of. goes without saying that such a decision shall be taken by the respondent No.2, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No goes without saying that such a decision shall be taken by the respondent No.2, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary MANPREET SINGH 2025.04.08 18:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment