Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27377 CRL.P No. 9581 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9581 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN:
SRI GIRIJESH @ G M GIRIJESH S/O LATE SRI G D MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.3924, 1ST CROSS, SUBASH NAGAR, NELAMANGALA TOWN – 562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BINU M., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NELAMANGALA RURAL P S REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560 001. 2. MISS. SINCHANA D/O VIJAYANAIK
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
BEST COUNTY PG
NEAR GANAPATHI TEMPLE
M.S. PALYA
BENGALURU – 560 097. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NAGESHWARAPPA K., HCGP FOR R-1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLIANT AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CRIME NO.215/2025 REGISTERED BY THE NELAMANGALA RURAL P.S, PENDING IN THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC COURT, NELAMANGALA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 309(4) AND 74 OF THE BNS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27377 CRL.P No. 9581 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following relief:
“To allow the petition and quash the FIR and Complaint against the petitioner in Crime No.215/2025 registered by the Nelamangala Rural P.S., pending in the file of Prl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) & JMFC Court, Nelamangala, Bengaluru Rural District., Bengaluru, for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4) & 74 of the B.N.S., and pass such other order/s as deemed fit, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 2. During pendency of the present petition, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo seeking permission to dismiss the petition as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the charge sheet. The said memo reads as under:
“The undersigned counsel for the petitioner humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss the petition as withdrawn and liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge the chargesheet, in the interest of justice and equity.”
3. The said memo is placed on record. 4.
Accordingly, petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to take
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27377 CRL.P No. 9581 of 2025
recourse to such remedies as available in law including approaching this Court by way of one more petition, if so advised. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
SV List No.: 3 Sl No.: 8