Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67791 (KAR)

SMT. CHIKKAMMA v. SRI NAGAHANUMAIAH

WP/4439/2021 · 2025-07-16

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26522 WP No. 4439 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 4439 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHIKKAMMA, SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS 1(A) SRI. V.N.VEERAKYATHAIAH, S/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS. 1(B) SMT. V.PADMAVATHI, W/O K.L.SRIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 1(C) SRI. V.NAGARAJA, S/O V.N.VEERAKYATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 1(D) SMT. V.CHANDRAKALA, W/O DAYANAND G., AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 1(E) SRI. V.CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O V.N.VEERAKYATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT ‘AMMAJI KRUPA’ NO.525, BEHIND GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, HEBBALA, BENGALURU - 560 024. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAJANNA L., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26522 WP No. 4439 of 2021 AND: 1. SRI. NAGAHANUMAIAH, S/O LATE BOMMALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT LAKKENAHALLI VILLAGE, SASALU HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. 2. SRI. RAJAKUMAR, S/O LATE BOMMALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT LAKKENAHALLI VILLAGE, SASALU HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TAULK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. PRESENTLY R/AT L.RAJAKUMAR, SCHOOL TEACHER, NO. 59/4, 9TH CROSS, 27TH WARD, ROJIPURA, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. 3. SMT. RATHNAMMA, D/O SRI. BOMMALINGAIAH, W/O SRI. SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT MADDE VILLAGE, HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT- 572 121. 4. SMT. CHIKKANAGAMMA, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26522 WP No. 4439 of 2021 D/O SRI. BOMMALINGAIAH, W/O SRI. SANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT KALLENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 132. 5. SRI. VEERAKYATHAIAH (RETD. POLICE), S/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT LAKKENAHALLI VILLAGE, SASALU HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. 6. SRI. NAGARAJAIAH, S/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT LAKKENAHALLI VILLAGE, SASALU HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. 7. SRI. APPAJAPPA, S/O HALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT VEERASAGARA VILLAGE, KOLALA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 129. 8. SRI. T.V.NAGABHUSHAN, S/O VEERAKYATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT THADI VILLAGE, I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK – 572 132. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26522 WP No. 4439 of 2021 9. SRI. T.V.CHANDRAMOULY, S/O VEERAKYATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT THADI VILLAGE, I.D.HALLI HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK – 572 132. 10. SMT. T.V.PADMA, D/O VEERAKYATHAPPA, W/O RANGANATHA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT KALLAMBELLA VILLAGE, KALLAMBELLA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK – 572 137. 11. SMT. T.V.BHARATHI, D/O VEERAKYATHAPPA, W/O RAMESHCHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, C/O PUTTANNASHETTY BEHIND JAIL, MADHUGIRI TOWN – 572 132. 12. SMT. DODDAKKA, D/O VEERAKYATHAPPA, W/O SIDDALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT BHAKTHARAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI , KORATAGERE TALUK – 572 129. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.R.RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. H.G.SWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R8 TO R12; R4 – SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED NOTICE TO R3, R5 TO R7 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 05.12.2024) - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26522 WP No. 4439 of 2021 THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD.16/02/2021 ON IA NO.V FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.8 TO 12 UNDER ORDER I RULE 10(2) R/W SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN O.S.NO.135/2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODDABALLAPURA VIDE ANNEXURE-G TO THE WRIT PETITION, CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE SAID APPLICATION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that the parties are wanting to report the settlement before the concerned Court. The only impediment that the parties are now facing is the pendency of the subject petition and subsistence of the interim order. 2. In the light of the settlement arrived at between the parties and the only issue of it being placed before the concerned Court, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition with a direction to the concerned Court to consider and pass appropriate orders on the settlement being placed before it. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26522 WP No. 4439 of 2021 In the light of the said settlement arrived at between the parties, the impugned order as a matter of norm stands quashed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33 CT:SS