SAGAR SARDAR AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM (A)/3136/2025 · 2025-10-31
Jay Sengupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67790 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67790 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
31.10.2025 Court No.28 Item No.30 ssi CRM (A) 3136 of 2025
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Diamond Harbour Women Police Station Case No. 10 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024 under Sections 448/376D/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of: Shri Sagar Sardar & others. ….Applicants/Petitioners
Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya
…for the petitioners Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Mujibar Ali Naskar
..for the State
Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record.
Despite service, no one appears on behalf of the de facto complainant.
Report filed on behalf of the State regarding issuance of proclamation is also taken on record.
Considering the incriminating materials available in the case diary including the statements of the victim made before a learned Magistrate alleging that the petitioners were standing guard when the offence was committed by the principal accused and the fact that the proclamation has already been issued against the present petitioners, I do not consider this is to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)