Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6779 (UTT)

CHANDRA PRAKASH v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE,

WPMS/1459/2025 · 2025-05-21

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D- 31 WPMS No. 1459 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Ms. Anjali Bhargava, Advocate for the respondent no. 3. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks renewal of Patta in his favour. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the file. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted Patta, but it is not being renewed despite the representation dated 12.01.2024 having been filed before the respondent no. 1/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent authorities may be directed to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 12.01.2024 within a stipulated period. Learned State Counsel gives a statement that the representation of the petitioner dated 12.01.2024 will be decided by the respondent no. 1 within a period of six weeks from today. The Court takes on record the statement made by the learned counsel for the State. In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent no. 1/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar within a period of six weeks from today. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 21.05.2025 Avneet/