PARIGABAI SHANKAR SONAWNE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/7369/2022 · 2025-12-04
Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67787 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67787 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
912-wp-7369-2022.odt (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7369 OF 2022 Parigabai Shankar Sonawne And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Megha Mali h/f Mr. Avhad Abhijeet P. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.S. Badakh ...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATED : DECEMBER 04, 2025 PER COURT :
1. Heard learned counsel for respective parties.
2. Present petition is directed against the order dated 13.02.2020 passed by the Divisional Commissioner in Revision No.2018/ROR/REV/42, order dated 24.11.2017 passed by the Additional
Collector,
Aurangabad
in
Appeal No.2016/Appeal/MLRC/CR-48 and order dated 29.03.2016 passed by the Sub Divisional Collector, Vaijapur in File No.2015/MJMA/CR- 85/2015. As these proceedings are arising out the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, the petitioner is having an alternate efficacious remedy of filing revision under Section 257 of the M.L.R. Code.
3. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others reported in 2015 AIR SCW 6277 has considered the issue by holding that the second revision before the State Government is maintainable. 2025:BHC-AUG:33918
912-wp-7369-2022.odt (2)
4. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as not maintainable. The petitioner is at liberty to file second revision before the State Government within a period of eight weeks from today.
5. The time spent while prosecuting this petition shall be taken into consideration by the State Government while considering the application for condonation of delay.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Mujaheed//