Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67772 (MAD)

A.KAMALAKANNAN v. STATE OF TAMILNADU

WP/21998/2025 · 2025-06-20

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.21998 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.21998 of 2025 1. A.Kamalakkannan 2. V.Rajakumar 3. R.Ganesan ... Petitioners Vs. 1. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Home (Police-IX) Department, The Secretariat, Chennai – 600005. 2. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 600004. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to grant retrospective seniority to the petitioners from 02.09.1993 their batch-mates Mr.I.Sivam and 9 others were appointed vide Na.Ka.No.182/91147/R&D (3)/93, dated 02.09.1993 without back wages and arrears of salary by way of notional seniority on par with their above batch mates within the time frame. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21998 of 2025 For Petitioners : Mr.T.Rajarathinam For Respondents : Mr.R.Sasikumar, Government Advocate ***** O R D E R The instant writ petition has been filed with a prayer for issuing a Mandamus to direct the respondents to grant retrospective seniority to the petitioners from 02.09.1993 their batch-mates Mr.I.Sivam and 9 others were appointed vide Na.Ka.No.182/91147/R&D (3)/93, dated 02.09.1993 without back wages and arrears of salary by way of notional seniority on par with their above batch mates within the time frame. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that they have given a representation dated 27.08.2024 for claiming seniority, and such representation is yet to be considered by the second respondent. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would fairly submit that they would consider the said representation of the petitioners within a reasonable time. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21998 of 2025 4. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record. 5. In view of the submission made by the Government Advocate, without going to the merits of this Writ Petition, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioners' representation dated 27.08.2024, and pass orders on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observations. No costs. 20.06.2025 1/2 kv Index : Yes/No Speaking order /Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes/No 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21998 of 2025 To 1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Home (Police-IX) Department, The Secretariat, Chennai – 600005. 2. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 600004. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21998 of 2025 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. kv W.P.No.21998 of 2025 20.06.2025 1/2 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis