Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67767 (PAT)

Prakash Rai v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./57431/2025 · 2025-08-30

Chandra Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57431 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2025 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Saran ====================================================== Prakash Rai Son of Lal Babu Ray @ Lalu Ray Resident of - Bariyarchak, P.S.- Nayagaon, District - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 30-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 79/2025 dated 11.05.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 120 litres of illicit country-made liquor along with 9 kg naushadar were recovered at bhathi situated in Gopalpur. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The other co-accused person has already Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57431 of 2025(2) dt.30-08-2025 2/2 been granted bail by this court vide order dated 25.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40360/2025. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents and he is on bail in both the cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 79/2025. 7. The application stands allowed. atul/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T