GHULAM MOHAMMAD KHODAM AND ANR. v. UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH AND ORS. (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT) (LADAKH CASE)
WP(C)/741/2021 · 2025-06-30
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6776 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6776 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S.No.40 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 741/2021 GHULAM MOHAMMAD KHODAM AND ANR. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF LADAKH AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Rehaana Qayoom, Advocate vice Mr. T.M. Shamsi, DSGI
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 30-06-2025
1. Perusal of the record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 29th December, 2023, 1st July, 2024, 23rd April, 2025 and same is the position as on date. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in further prosecution of the case.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition along with connected CM(s) shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated. ;
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 30-06-2025 Mubashir