SHAM LAL SHARMA AND ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/19103/2020 · 2025-09-02
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67752 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67752 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
231
CWP-19103-2020
Date of Decision: 02.09.2025
Sham Lal Sharma and others
…Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- None for the petitioners
Mr. Aakash Singla, Additional Advocate General, Haryana
Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate for respondents no.5 & 9
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioners. Despite last opportunity granted on 05.04.2025, neither has the correct address of respondent no.8 been furnished, nor have the costs in terms of order, dated 15.02.2025, been deposited.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE 02.09.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2025.09.03 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment