IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58283 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2024 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul ====================================================== 1. VIKRAM KUMAR MAHTO @ VIKRAM MAHAHO @ VIKRAM MAHTO Son of Kashi Prasad Mahato R/o village - Bhaptiyahi, P.S.- Bhaptai Sarai, District - Supaul 2. Mahesh Kumar Mahto @ Mahesh Mahato Son of Kashi Prasad Mahato R/o village - Bhaptiyahi, P.S.- Bhaptai Sarai, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisu Zzoha For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 04-09-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 223, 132, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 61(2), 121(1), 121(2), 324(4), 324(5) of the B.N.S.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that under trial prisoner Lal Yadav died during treatment, on account of which, a ruckus was created by the accused persons who jammed NH-57 and also damaged to vehicle passersby and assaulted the police force causing injury and the accused were identified by the chowkidar. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58283 of 2025(2) dt.04-09-2025 2/2 informant. It is next submitted that petitioners have their shop near the place of occurrence as such out of inquisitiveness they had gone to see as to why the villagers were jamming NH-57 when police and villagers became enraged. It is also submitted that it does not appear probable that chowkidar could have identified so many accused. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and also taking into consideration the fact that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No.177/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T