Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
243 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-1837-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.02.2025 Deen Mohd. @ Deena and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Narinder Pal Nain, Advocate for Mr. Tanvir Singh Grewal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) The instant revision petition has been preferred by the petitioners against the order and charge-sheet dated 04.04.2019, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh, whereby charges were ordered to be framed against the petitioners under Sections 148, 323, 325, 302 and 506 read with Section 149 IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR)
JUDGE 06.02.2025 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2025.02.07 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh