Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6774 (JHR)

MANISH DAS ALIAS MANISH KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2125/2025 · 2025-07-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:17414] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2125 of 2025 ------ Manish Das @ Manish Kumar Das, aged about 20 years, son of Rohit Das, resident of Village Paniyara, P.O. and P.S.- Pathrol, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 01-07-2025 I.A. No.7229 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant bail application. Since, the hearing of instant bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands rejected being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2125 of 2025 The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.134 of 2024 registered under Section 318 (4), 319 (2), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 B, 66 C, 66 D and 84 C of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and two mobile phones and one SIM Cards has been recovered from his possession and he has defrauded the victims Thadepalli Sriveni and Md. Yakoob to the tune of Rs.77,830/- and Rs.1,41,963/- respectively. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will transfer the amount allegedly defrauded to the bank account of the aforesaid victims without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.12.2024 as is evident from para-16 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transferring Rs.77,830/- in the account of victim Thadepalli Sriveni and transferring Rs.1,41,963/- in the account of the victim Md. Yakoob without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum Special Judge, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.134 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/