CRWP-6007-2025 (O&M) 120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Harjeet Kaur and another State of Punjab CORAM : HON’BLE Present: Mr. SUDEEPTI SHARMA 1. Through the instant petition, as filed under Constitution of India official respondents, respondent Nos. 4 petitioners or interfering in their peaceful life. 2. Notice of motion to the official respondent(s) only. 3. On the asking of the Court, M accepts notice on behalf of the official 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a civil suit against the private respondent Nos. 4 to 6 pendency of the said civil suit, the private respondents are now harassing and threatening the petitioners official respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners filed before SHO, Sangrur (Punjab) on 23.05.2025 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR Date of Decision : Harjeet Kaur and another VERSUS Punjab and others HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Mr. Ankush Dhanerwal, Advocate for the petitioner -.- SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) Through the instant petition, as filed under Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought issuance of directions upon the respondents, to ensure protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of . 4 to 6, and, also to restrain the said petitioners or interfering in their peaceful life. Notice of motion to the official respondent(s) only. On the asking of the Court, Mr accepts notice on behalf of the official respondent(s) Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a civil suit against the private respondent Nos. 4 to 6 pendency of the said civil suit, the private respondents are now harassing and the petitioners. Therefore, he prays that a direction be issued to the official respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners filed before SHO, Sangrur (Punjab) on 23.05.2025. -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RWP-6007-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 05.06.2025 ....Petitioner ....Respondent SUDEEPTI SHARMA , Advocate for the petitioners. Through the instant petition, as filed under Article 226/227 of the sought issuance of directions upon the to ensure protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of , and, also to restrain the said respondent from harassing the Notice of motion to the official respondent(s) only. r. K.D. Sachdeva, DAG Punjab respondent(s). s submits that the petitioners have filed a civil suit against the private respondent Nos. 4 to 6 and during the pendency of the said civil suit, the private respondents are now harassing and Therefore, he prays that a direction be issued to the official respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners filed before - ....Petitioners ....Respondents of the sought issuance of directions upon the to ensure protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of respondent from harassing the Punjab, petitioners have and during the pendency of the said civil suit, the private respondents are now harassing and Therefore, he prays that a direction be issued to the official respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners filed before Gaurav Arora 2025.06.05 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6007-2025 (O&M) 5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused whole file of the case with his able assistance. 6. Since in the present case, the civil suit between the parties is already going on, therefore petition. 7. Accordingly, the present 8. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. June 05, 2025 Gaurav Arora Whether speaking/non Whether reportable 2025 (O&M) I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused whole file of the case with his able assistance. Since in the present case, the civil suit between the parties is already going on, therefore, this Court did not feel it appropriate to entertain the present Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No -2- I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the Since in the present case, the civil suit between the parties is already this Court did not feel it appropriate to entertain the present petition is dismissed. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE speaking : Speaking : Yes/No - the Since in the present case, the civil suit between the parties is already this Court did not feel it appropriate to entertain the present Gaurav Arora 2025.06.05 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document