MOHAN BAHADUR KARKI DARJJI @ MOHAN BAHADUR DARJJI v. THE ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK AND 5 ORS (F)
WP(C)/679/2024 · 2025-06-25
Arun Dev Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6772 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6772 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010020532024
2025:GAU-AS:8703
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/679/2024 MOHAN BAHADUR KARKI DARJJI @ MOHAN BAHADUR DARJJI S/O- LATE JAI KARKI DARJJI, R/O- SANTAPUR SISAPATHAR, P.O- LAHALIAL, P.S- BIHPURIA, DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK AND 5 ORS (F) A JOINT UNDERTAKING OF THE GOVT. OF INDIA, GOVT OF ASSAM AND UNITED BANK OF INDIA HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT G.S ROAD BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI-05, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2:THE CHAIRMAN THE ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK
HEAD OFFICE AT G.S ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-05 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:THE REGIONAL OFFICE THE ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK
REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER REGIONAL OFFICE -LAKHIMPUR
P.S- LAKHIOMPUR DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 4:THE CHIEF MANAGER (ACCOUNTS)
Page No.# 2/3 THE ASSAM GRAMIN VIKASH BANK
HEAD OFFICE AT G.S ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-05 DIST- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 5:LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA DIVISIONAL OFFICE JEEVAN PRAKASH FANCY BAZAR GUWAHATI (KAMRUP (M) ASSAM REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER 6:THE MANAGER LIC (P AND GS UNIT) LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA DIVISIONAL JEEVAN PRAKASH 5TH FLOOR SS ROAD FANCY BAZAR GUWAHATI (KAMRUP (M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. L MOHAN, MR. P GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A L MANDAL (r-5,6), MR. A DHANUKA (r-1 to 4),MR. A GANGULY (r-1 to 4),MR. A. GANGULY (SC, AGVB)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 26.06.2025
Mr. P Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous and accordingly the same may be closed. Mr. A Ganguly, learned standing counsel, AGVB for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Mr. A.L. Mondal, learned counsel for
Page No.# 3/3 respondent Nos.5 & 6 have no objection. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed being infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant