S. No.334 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP No.16901 of 2024 Date of Decision:29.07.2025 Union of India and others .....Petitioners Vs. Ex. Naik Suresh Kumar and another .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present:- None. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) The Tribunal has allowed the claim of respondents for inclusion of service element in the disability pension relying upon the judgment of the Surpeme Court in Union of India and others Vs. Surinder Singh Parmar, Civil Appeal No.9389 of 2014 decided on 20.01.2015, (2015) 3 SCC 404. Learned counsel for petitioners- Union of India and the respondent have made a statement before the Tribunal that the facts of the present case are concluded by the adjudication made by the Supreme Court in Surinder Singh parmar’s case (supra). 2. We have otherwise examined the issue in CWP No.1947 of 2025 – Union of India and others Vs. No.13742023 Ex. Nk Milap Chand and another, decided on 28.07.2025. For the reasons recorded therein, similar direction of the RENU 2025.08.01 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.16901 of 2024 -2- Tribunal has been sustained. None has otherwise appeared to press the writ petition which is consequently dismissed for want of prosecution. ( ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ) JUDGE (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE July 29, 2025 renu Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RENU 2025.08.01 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh