Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67707 (BOM)

Gajanan Shriram Pakhare v. The State of Maharashtra Copy to be served on Government

CP/759/2025 · 2025-11-25

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

933 CONT. PETITION NO. 759 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 933 CONT. PETITION NO. 759 OF 2025 IN WP/1524/2023 GAJANAN SHRIRAM PAKHARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … • Mr. Damodar Ramkrishna Irale, Advocate for the Petitioner • Ms. V. S. Chaudhari, AGP for State • Adv. A. R. Tapse h/f. Mr. Prashant D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 25, 2025 P E R C O U R T : 1. By passing the order dated 24.11.2025, respondents have complied with the order. Copy of the same be served on the petitioner. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner rightly submitted that the time stipulated in the order is not followed by the respondents and they have also not tendered any apology. 3. Learned AGP and learned advocate appearing for Respondent No. 2 submit that they were instructed to file affidavit and tender unconditional apology for the delay caused in passing of the order. They tender unconditional apology on behalf of the respondents for the delay. The apology is accepted. komal kamble 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:32694-DB 933 CONT. PETITION NO. 759 OF 2025 4. In view of compliance of the order, Contempt Petition is disposed of. 5. The respondents shall take steps to revise the seniority list and place the petitioner at appropriate position within eight weeks from today. Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order, if he is aggrieved by the same. [VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 2/2