- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33758-DB RFA No. 134 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 134 OF 2021 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. M PRAKASH S/O A MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/A NO.1058/3 PRAGATHI 4TH CROSS ROAD K.N EXTENSION YESHWANTHAPURA BANGALORE-560 022 2. SMT. D.N GAYATHRI W/O SRI. M. PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/A NO.1058/3 PAGATHI 4TH CROSS ROAD K.N EXTENSION YESHWANTHAPURA BANGALORE-560 022 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. T.M VENKATA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RAGHAVENDRA, 2. SRI. B.M. VENUGOPAL Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33758-DB RFA No. 134 of 2021 S/O LATE B.K MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/A NO.1346, 8TH MAIN, 11TH CROSS, WEST OF CHORD ROAD MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BANGALORE-560 086 3. SRI. B. MARIYAPPA 4. SRI P V KRISHNAPPA 5. SRI P V MANJUNATH 6. SRI B KESHAVA REDDY 7. SMT GAYATHRI SATISH 8. A BHARATHI 9. SRI RAJA REDDY 10. SRI K RAVI 11. SMT S USHA RANI 12. SRI K R SANTOSH KUMAR 13. SRI SANGEETHA PANDURAJ 14. MS SANDHYA 15. SRI PRASAD SWAMY B N 16. SRI L RAJANNA 17. SRI GURURAJ V PATIL …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.MUNIYAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R2, SRI. K.V. SHYAMAPRASADA, ADVOCATE FOR R6, R7, R8, R9 & R14, SRI. A. SAMPATH, ADVOCATE FOR R5, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33758-DB RFA No. 134 of 2021 R1, R3, R11 R17 SERVED - UNREPRESENTED, VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 29.08.2025, R1, R3-R17 DELETED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W. ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF THE CPC 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.10.2013 PASSED IN OS NO.1141/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH- 44, BANGALORE PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) A compromise petition is filed by the appellants and respondent No.2. The same is taken on record. 2. The parties are present before the Court today and they have been duly identified by their respective counsel. They submit that the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. 3. In the above view of the matter, the appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of compromise entered into - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33758-DB RFA No. 134 of 2021 between the parties. Decree shall be drawn up in terms of compromise. All pending Interlocutory Application[s] shall stand disposed of. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 84