Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67646 (ALL)

M/S MAA VAISHNO AGRO INDUSTRIES v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/19817/2025 · 2025-07-23

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121594-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19817 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Maa Vaishno Agro Industries Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Himanshu Srivastava,Madan Lal Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Present petition has been filed for the following relief: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to direct the Respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the Revision No. 85 (R)/G & M (U.P.)/2024 (M/S Maa Vaishno Agro Industries vs. District Magistrate, District - Kanpur Dehat and Others) within a stipulated time and till the disposal of the aforesaid revision direct the respondents not to take any coercive step against the petitioner in pursuance of the recovery certificate dated 24.06.2024 issued by the District Magistrate, Jalaun or: II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to direct the Respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the Stay Application pending in Revision No. 85 (R) / G & M (U.P.) / 2024 (M/S Maa Vaishno Agro Industries vs. District Magistrate, District - Kanpur Dehat and Others) within a stipulated time and till the disposal of the Stay Application pending in aforesaid revision direct the respondents not to take any coercive step against the petitioner in pursuance of the recovery certificate dated 24.06.2024 issued by the District Magistrate, Jalaun" 3. The petitioner has approached this court praying for a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the revision no.85(R)/G & M (U.P.)/2024 (M/S Maa Vaishno Agro Industries Vs. District Magistrate Jalaun & Others) under Rule 80 of the U.P. Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 2021, within a time bound period. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that a direction be issued to the respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid revision, within a time bound period. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2-Special Secretary/Revisional Authority, Directorate of Geology and Mining, Lucknow, U.P. to decide the aforesaid revision of the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. 6. For a period of three months or till the decision in the aforesaid revision, whichever is earlier, no coercive measure shall be taken against the petitioner for recovering the amount. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 S.Chaurasia (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad