DAILY LOK ADALAT 505 Present: filed, has died, Mr. Rishabh appellants and filed his memo of appearance on 01.03.2025. He sought time to file his stated by Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate that he was not in contact wit the appellants and thus circumstances, notice was issued to the appellants at both the addresses not been received back served or otherwise while one sent at Bathinda’s such person is residing at the given address. the appellants pleads no instructions. record. Liberty is, however, reserved to the appellants to get this appeal revived, if so advised, by moving an appropriate application. parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last the appellants. 15.05.2025 NainaRajput DAILY LOK ADALAT FAO-4658-2011 PREM LAL MEHRA @ PREM BAHADUR BARJINDER SINGH & ORS. Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for PRTC. * * * * As the original counsel through whom this appeal was has died, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate appeared for the appellants and filed his memo of appearance on 01.03.2025. He sought time to file his vakalatnama. On the adjourned date, it was stated by Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate that he was not in contact wit the appellants and thus, was not able to put up any proposal. In the circumstances, notice was issued to the appellants at both the addresses. Notice sent to the appellants at not been received back served or otherwise while one sent at Bathinda’s address has been received back with the report that no such person is residing at the given address. Today again, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate appearing for the appellants pleads no instructions. In the circumstances, the file is ordered to be consigne record. Liberty is, however, reserved to the appellants to get this appeal revived, if so advised, by moving an appropriate application. A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last the appellants. ( 15.05.2025 BENCH NO.3 MEHRA @ PREM BAHADUR & ANR. VS . Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for PRTC. As the original counsel through whom this appeal was Gupta, Advocate appeared for the appellants and filed his memo of appearance on 01.03.2025. He . On the adjourned date, it was stated by Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate that he was not in contact with , was not able to put up any proposal. In the circumstances, notice was issued to the appellants at both the . Notice sent to the appellants at their Nepal’s address has not been received back served or otherwise while one sent at their address has been received back with the report that no such person is residing at the given address. Today again, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate appearing for In the circumstances, the file is ordered to be consigned to record. Liberty is, however, reserved to the appellants to get this appeal revived, if so advised, by moving an appropriate application. A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the parties. A copy of this order be also sent at the last known address of (G.C. GARG) PRESIDENT (MAHAVIR SINGH CHAUHAN) MEMBER VS As the original counsel through whom this appeal was Gupta, Advocate appeared for the appellants and filed his memo of appearance on 01.03.2025. He . On the adjourned date, it was h , was not able to put up any proposal. In the circumstances, notice was issued to the appellants at both the Nepal’s address has their address has been received back with the report that no Today again, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate appearing for d to record. Liberty is, however, reserved to the appellants to get this A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the known address of ) PRESIDENT ) MEMBER NAINA KATHIAT 2025.05.20 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document