Deepak Rawani @ Ravindra Rawani @ Deepak Ramani @ Ravindra Ramani @ Deepak @ Ravindra Ram v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./63545/2024 · 2025-01-10
Ramesh Chand Malviya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67642 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67642 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63545 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-469 Year-2023 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Deepak Rawani @ Ravindra Rawani @ Deepak Ramani @ Ravindra Ramani @ Deepak @ Ravindra Ram aged about 41 years Male, Son of Late Dhupan Rawani @ Dhupan Ramani @ Deepak Villaga- Budhparaiya P.S.- Paraiya, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murli Dhar, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 2 10-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 469 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with co-accused persons came at the house of the informant lashed with arms and ammunition and locked the informant, his wife in a room and also threatened them to keep silence and not file a case against them and looted jewelers and cash of Rs. 1,50,000/- from the house of the informant and fled away. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63545 of 2024(2) dt.10-01-2025 2/3 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion due to previous enmity. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Nothing incriminating articles has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has been made accused only on the basis of confessional statement of co- accused Ganesh Chaudhary. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 30.04.2024. 5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 6. From perusal of the FIR and impugned order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Gaya- dated 03.07.2024, it appears that petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Ganesh Chaudhary who has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 06.03.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 12333/2024 by this Court. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
Petitioner has not arrested at the spot and charge-sheet has also been submitted against the petitioner, accordingly the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63545 of 2024(2) dt.10-01-2025 3/3 the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 469 of 2023. annpurna/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U T