IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 220 CWP-20831-2018 Date of Decision: 26.03.2025 MEENA AND OTHERS ... Petitioners. VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. **** Present: Mr. Surinder Kumar Daaria, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition is for directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners according to the policy decision dated 01.10.2003 (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential benefits with interest @ 24% per annum. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that controversy involved in the present petition is squarely covered in terms of the Single Bench Judgment dated 31.01.2020 passed in ‘Balwinder Singh and Others Versus State of Haryana and Others’, which was affirmed by this Court in LPA No.688 of 2021 decided on 02.12.2022. The present writ petition was adjourned sine die to await the outcome of pending SLP against the abovesaid order/judgment. Vide order dated 09.01.2024, the SLP No.4531 of 2023 titled as ‘State of Haryana and Ors.’ RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.03.31 22:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-20831-2018 -2- Versus Balwinder Singh and Others’ filed by the State of Haryana has been dismissed and the order of this Court has been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Learned State Counsel is not in a position to controvert the same. The present petition is thus disposed of in terms of the judgment of this Court dated 02.12.2022 passed by the Division Bench in LPA No.688 of 2021. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) MARCH 26, 2025. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.03.31 22:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document