[140] Nitin Sharm Shilpa Shar Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] Constituion 6917-2024 24.04.2024 provisions [2] appearing during the p [3] has lost its (Annexure IN THE HIGH COURT OF PU AT CHANDIGAR CR-4050- Date of De Sharma and others versus a Sharma HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Aman Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Deep Inder Singh Walia, for the respondent. **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Petitioners are before this C tituion of India, seeking quashing o 2024 tited as ‘Shilpa Sharma versus .2024 (Annexure P-16) filed by isions of the Protection of Women from It has been brought to the n aring for the respondent-complainant g the pendency of the present revision In view of the above, this Co ost its relevance. More so, when pe exure P-10) in his favour whereby, her OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH -2024 (O&M) of Decision : 20.01.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN alia, Advocate this Court under Article 227 of th ing of complaint bearing No.COMA rsus Nitin Sharma and others’, date d by the respondent under variou en from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. the notice of this Court by couns lainant that unfortunately she has die vision petition. is Court finds that the complaint itse hen petitioner No.1 already has decre by, her marriage itself stands annulled of the COMA- ’, dated various 2005. counsel died int itself s decree nulled. RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.01.22 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-4050- [4] Court to ad [5] [6] disposed of 20.01.2025 ‘R. Sharma' -2024 (O&M) In view of the above, nothing to adjudicate. Dismissed as nothing survives All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable -2- othing survives at the hands of this rvives in the present petition. eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No f this tands IN) RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.01.22 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document