Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6762 (RAJ)

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE

CRLR/689/2006 · 2025-03-19

Shubha Mehta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12513] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 689/2006 Anil Kumar S/o Siyaram R/o Mohammadabad, P.S. Mohammadabad, Distt. Farukkabad U.P. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Sogarwal with Mr. Aditya Joshi For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 19/03/2025 ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky;] U;kf;d eftLVªsV] izFke oxZ] la[;k&2 Hkjriqj ds uEcjh QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k&79@2001 ljdkj&cuke&deyk nsoh ,oa vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 17-03-2005 ftlds }kjk fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 498&, ,oa 323 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k esa nks"kfl) dj vf/kdre ,d o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ,oa ,d gtkj :i;s ds vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k ,oa mlds fo:) izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k&11@2005] fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&02] Hkjriqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 27-06-2006 ls fujLr fd, tkus ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gSa fd fnukad 09-03-2000 dks ifjoknh jkeyky us iqfyl Fkkuk dksrokyh Hkjriqj ij ,d fjiksVZ bl vk'k; dh ntZ djkbZ fd mldh iq=h iwue dh 'kknh vfHk;qDr ds lkFk fnukad 06-02-+1998 dks gqbZ FkhA mldh cPph dks ngst ds dkj.k vfuy dqekj ,oa mlds ifjtu ijs'kku djrs o ngst ekaxrs Fks] bl lEcU/k esa iwoZ esa ,d vU; izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ o"kZ 1999 esa ntZ djkus ,oa mlesa jkthukek gksus ds ckn iqu% iwue ds lkFk ekjihV dj ?kj ls fudky [2025:RJ-JP:12513] (2 of 4) [CRLR-689/2006] fn;k gS&&&bR;kfnA bl ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 95@2000 iathc) dj ckn vuqla/kku fuxjkdkj@vfHk;qDr ,oa deyk nsoh ds fo:) vijk/k /kkjk 498&,] 323] 406 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vijk/k izekf.kr ekurs gq, vkjksi&i= U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;kA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) mDr /kkjkvksa ds vkjksi i`Fkd ls fojfpr dj lquk, o le>k, x,A vfHk;kstu i{k dh vksj ls vkjksfir vijk/k dks izekf.kr djus gsrq dqy 12 xokgku dks izLrqr dj ijhf{kr djok;k x;k ,oa izn'kZ ih&1 yxk;r ih&11 rd nLrkost izLrqr dj iznf'kZr djok;k x;sA vfHk;kstu lk{; ds vk/kkj ij vfHk;qDrx.k dk /kkjk 313 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA ckn fopkj.k fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 498&, Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k esa ,d o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ,oa ,d gtkj :i;s rFkk /kkjk 323 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k esa N% ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o ikap lkS :i;s vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;kA vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 406 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k ls nks"keqDr fd;k x;kA mDr fu.kZ; ds fo:) fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls vihy izLrqr djus ij fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 27-06-2006 ls mldh vihy fujLr dj nh xbZA bUgha fu.kZ;ksa ls O;fFkr gksdj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk bl U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr dh xbZ gSA nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh xbZA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ jgk fd os fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh /kkjk 498&, ,oa /kkjk 323 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa dh xbZ nks"kfl)h dks dksbZ pqukSrh ugha nsrs gSa ,oa mldks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+rs gq, iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dks fuLrkfjr djus dk fuosnu djrs gSaA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd fuxjkdkj o"kZ 2000 ls vUoh{kk Hkqxr jgk gS rFkk vfHk;qDr dks vf/kdre ,d o"kZ ds dkjkokl ds n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k Fkk] ftlesa ls og yxHkx 03 ekg 26 fnu dh vof/k vfHkj{kk esa O;rhr dj pqdk gSA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr iwoZ esa fdlh Hkh izdj.k esa nks"kfl) ugha jgk gSA vr% ujeh dk :[k viukrs gq, fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+us dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA mUgksaus vius rdZ leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk voyEc fy;kA [2025:RJ-JP:12513] (3 of 4) [CRLR-689/2006] 1- Alister Anthony Pareira Vs. State of Maharashtra MANU/SC/0015/2012 : (2012) 2 SCC 648 2- Haripada Das Vs. State of W.B. MANU/SC/1627/1998 : (1998) 9 SCC 678 fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us bldk fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd nksuksa U;k;ky;ksa }kjk fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks nks"kfl) djrs gq, ikfjr n.Mkns'k leqfpr gSA rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izLrqr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k dh ?kVuk o"kZ 1999 dh gSA rRle; vfHk;qDr 20 o"kZ dk uo;qod gksuk i=koyh ls Li"V gksrk gSA ?kVuk dks yxHkx 25-5 o"kZ iw.kZ gks pqds gSaA ;|fi fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls nks"kfl)h dks dksbZ pqukSrh ugha nh xbZ gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa xq.kkoxq.k ij nksuksa U;k;ky;ksa ds vkykSP; fu.kZ;ksa dk miyC/k lk{; ds izdk'k esa fo'ys"k.k o foospu fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA dsoy fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+us dh lhfer izkFkZuk ij fopkj fd;k tkuk gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/k esa nks"kfl) fd;k tkdj vf/kdre ,d o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ,oa vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr mls nh xbZ ,d o"kZ dh ltk ds fo:) fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk izLrqr vfHkj{kk izek.k&i= ds vuqlkj yxHkx 03 ekg 26 fnu rd vfHkj{kk esa jg pqdk gSA og o"kZ 1999 ls vFkkZr fiNys 25-5 o"kZ ls vUoh{kk Hkqxr jgk gSA U;k;ky; ds le{k fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us iwoZ esa fdlh vU; izdj.k esa mldh nks"kfl)h ugha gksuk izdV fd;k gSA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) dksbZ izfrdwy rF; Hkh vfHkys[k ij izLrqr ugha gqvk gSA vr% vc mls dkjkokl Hkqxrk;s tkus gsrq tsy Hksts tkus ls fdlh lkFkZd mn~ns'; dh iwfrZ ugha gksxhA vfHk;qDr dks fn;s x;s dkjkokl ds n.M dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk rd ?kVkus@lhfer djus ds laca/k esa izLrqr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa esa izfrikfnr fuEu fl)kUr egRoiw.kZ o lqlaxr gS % [2025:RJ-JP:12513] (4 of 4) [CRLR-689/2006] Alister Anthony Pareira (Supra) "There is no straitjacket formula for sentencing an accused on proof of crime. The courts have evolved certain principles: twin objective of the sentencing policy is deterrence and correction. What sentence would meet the ends of justice depends on the facts and circumstances of each case and the court must keep in mind the gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, nature of the offence and all other attendant circumstances." Haripada Das (Supra) "...considering the fact that the respondent had already undergone detention for some period and the case is pending for a pretty long time for which he had suffered both financial hardship and mental agony and also considering the fact that he had been released on bail as far back as on 17-1-1986, we feel that the ends of justice will be met in the facts of the case if the sentence is reduced to the period already undergone..." ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mi;qZDr U;kf;d fofuf'p;ksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ,oa orZeku izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks fn;s x;s vf/kdre ,d o"kZ ds dkjkokl ,oa leLr vFkZn.M dks ?kVkrs gq, mlds LFkku ij mls vc rd Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+k tkuk U;k; ds fgr esa i;kZIr vkSj U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA ifj.kker% fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk nks"kfl)h dh gn rd fujLr dh tkrh gSA n.Mkns'k ds fcUnq ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; o vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr n.Mkns'k dks mikUrfjr@ la'kksf/kr djrs gq, mls /kkjk 498&, Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa iznRr ,d o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ,oa ,d gtkj :i;s vFkZn.M rFkk /kkjk 323 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa iznRr N% ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ,oa ikap lkS :i;s vFkZn.M ds LFkku ij fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks vc rd dh Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ls nf.Mr fd;k tkrk gSA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr tekur ij vktkn gS] vr% mlds tekur eqpyds fujLr fd;s tkrs gSaA rnuqlkj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk ,oa layXu izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gks] fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA (SHUBHA MEHTA),J AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /07