Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6761 (GAU)

THE MANAGEMENT OF BATA INDIA LTD v. HRIDAYANANDA PHUKAN and ANR.

WP(C)/2274/2017 · 2025-08-18

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010019832017 2025:GAU-AS:11013 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2274/2017 THE MANAGEMENT OF BATA INDIA LTD HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT 418/02, BATA HOUSE, MG ROAD, SECTOR 17, GURGAON, HARYANA- 122001 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR. DIPANKAR ROY, DISTRICT MANAGER VERSUS HRIDAYANANDA PHUKAN and ANR. S/O- LATE BAPU RAM PHUKAN, R/O- VILL- SALAL GAON, P.S- LAKHIMPUR, P.O- PANIGAON, DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, EX EMPLOYEE, M/S BATA SHOP NORTH LAKHIMPUR 2:PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT ASSAM PANBAZAR GUWAHATI- 781001 DIST- KAMRUPM ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.T ROY, MRS I BEGUM,MS.B SARKAR,MR.S DEY Advocate for the Respondent : MR.A BHATTACHARYYAR-1, MS.M KALITA(R-1),MR.P P DUTTA(R-1),MR.A BORA(R-1) BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 19.08.2025 None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call. Page No.# 2/2 2. Mr P P Dutta, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No. 1. 3. It is seen that the petitioner is not represented before this Court on various dates, i.e., on 08.05.2025, 05.08.2025, as well as on 12.08.2025. 4. Taking into account the above, it seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the instant proceeding, for which the instant petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. The records be returned after 90 days from the date of the instant order, to the learned Labour Court. JUDGE Comparing Assistant