HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20911 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant and perused the material brought on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that applicant is named in the F.I.R. along with seven other named and two-three unknown persons. General allegation has been made against the applicant and no specific allegation has been made against him. Three other named co- accused, Abhimanyu Bind, Sukvilas Bind @ Sukat and Motilal Bindh have already been enlarged on bail and as the case of applicant is not on the worse footing than that of the co-accused as general allegation has been made against the applicant, the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 17.03.2025 with no criminal history. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant but they could not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rama Kant Yadav, Sant Ram Nigam, Satyendra Vishwakarma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh, G.A., Meva Lal Yadav, Yashvant Singh Govind Bind .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 5. Let the applicant-Govind Bind, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 61 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 352, 115(2), 351(3), 131, 333, 324(2), 105, 117(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Karimuddinpur, District- Ghazipur, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 6. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law. September 17, 2025 Mustaqeem. BAIL No. 20911 of 2025 2 (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad