SMT SUMAN YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA529/1917/2025 · 2025-07-06
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 67602 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:105624 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1917 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt Suman Yadav And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Lakhan Prajapati,Yashpal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as B.N.S.S.) has been filed with a prayer to direct the learned trial court to decide Matrimonial Case No. 2144 of 2022 (Suman Yadav Vs. Rohit Yadav), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Newadia, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants before this Court are aggrieved wife and her minor daughter. It is further submitted that the interim maintenance was awarded in favour of daughter of the applicant but no maintenance allowance has been granted in favour of the applicant no. 1 Smt. Suman Yadav. It is next submitted that evidence of the applicant has been recorded but the opposite party no. 2 is not cooperating for expeditious disposal of the case. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned trial court is directed to make all endeavours to decide the aforesaid case as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and keeping in view the heavy workload in the said court, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court/Presiding Officer is not the
only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Rmk.
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad