Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6758 (UTT)

SACHIN CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/337/2024 · 2025-03-27

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2338 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 27.03.2025 CRLR No.337 of 2024 Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. Ms. Menka Tripathi, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 4. Learned counsel for the revisionist would submit that she does not want to press the present criminal revision and seeks permission to withdraw the same. 5. Permission is granted. 6. In view of the above, the present criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 27.03.2025 SS