APHC010064932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 3524/2025 Between: M/s Sri Chandana Food Park Ltd., ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V RAJENDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 3524/2025 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “….pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned notice dated 17.01.2025 issued by the respondent No.3 under which the petitioner was threatened with action without any further notice which implies interference with the activities of the petitioner and continuing the attempts of interference despite the reply dated 23.01.2025 given by the petitioner as highly illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and without jurisdiction and in utter violation of the terms and conditions of the allotment and alienation in the form of the registered sale deed vide Doc.No.3476/2018 dated 10th May, 2018 in favour of the petitioner and without completing the mutation of the land under the said sale deed in favour of the petitioner and in violation of the provisions of APllC Act, Transfer of Property Act besides in violation of the principles of natural justice also in violation of Articles 14, 21, 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequentially to set aside the impugned notice with a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the developmental activities under taken by the petitioner under the project and with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner and pass such other order.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that since the facts and circumstances of this Case are similar to that of W.P.No.3523 of 2025, he prays to pass similar order in this Writ Petition also. 4. Learned Standing counsel for the respondents does not refute the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Relevant paragraph of the order dated 12.02.2025 passed in W.P.No.3523 of 2025 is extracted hereunder: “Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, this Court is of the considered view that the present writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the respondent corporation to consider the petitioner’s explanation dated 25.01.2025 within a period of four (04) weeks from today, after providing the petitioner with an opportunity for a personal hearing, and to pass a speaking order in accordance with the terms of the allotment and the regulations of the respondent corporation. In the meanwhile, the respondent corporation is directed not to initiate any coercive steps against the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.” 4 6. In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s explanation dated 23.01.2025 within a period of four (04) weeks from today, after providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, and to pass a speaking order in accordance with the terms of the allotment and the regulations of the respondents. In the meanwhile, the respondents are directed not to initiate any coercive steps against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Registry is directed to attach a copy of the order dated 12.02.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.3523 of 2025 to this order. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 13.02.2025 TPS 5 176 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 3524 of 2025 13.02.2025 TPS