Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67573 (KAR)

SRI K SUTHEETHACHAR KATTI v. SRI SURESH S BIJAPUR

WP/7392/2022 · 2025-09-01

M G S Kamal

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33946 WP No. 7392 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 7392 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI K. SUTHEERTHACHAR KATTI AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O LATE DR.PRAHALLADA RAO, R/AT NO. 561/1, 6TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS, OPP TO CONVENT SCHOOL P.J.EXTENSION DAVANAGERE - 577 002. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARASIMHA PRASAD S D.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. SURESH S BIJAPUR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE B.SHESHACHALA R/AT NO.609/1, 15TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN, K.T.J. NAGAR, DAVANAGERE - 577 004. 2. DR.VENKATARAM AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, DOCTOR IN JANAPRIYA HOSPITAL, BELONGING TO DR.KRISHNA .G. NADAGOUDAR, DEHSPANDE NAGARA, BEHIND K.I.MS., HUBBALLI - 580 009. 3. SRI. RAMAGOPAL AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O SRI. K.SUTHEERTHACHAR KATTI, R/AT NO.561/1, 6TH MAIN, Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33946 WP No. 7392 of 2022 5TH CROSS, OPP TO CONVENT SCHOOL, P.J.EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE - 577 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K SREEDHAR.,ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 AND R3 ARE SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 14-12-2021, PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT OF I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT DAVANGERE, IN OS NO.79/2017 ON INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5 TO 7 UNDER ORDER XVI RULE 1 AND 2 UNDER ORDER XVI RULE 6 AND ORDER VI RULE 17 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, RESPECTIVE (VIDE ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel of the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous. In view of the dismissal of the suit in O.S.No.79/2019 before the trial court, from which the impugned order arises. 2. Submission taken on record. 3. Petition dismissed having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 38 Sl No.: 14