Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6757 (KAR)

BASAVARAJ S/O VEERBHADRAPPA v. RAMANGOUDA S/O SAKKARAGOUDA PATIL,

RSA/100738/2017 · 2025-06-26

M G S Kamal

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8046 RSA No. 100738 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100738/2017 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. BASAVARAJ S/O. VEERBHADRAPPA DHUPAD, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE. 2. BANDAMMA W/O. IRANNA JUNJA, AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD. 3. SHANKRAVVA W/O. VEERBHADRAPPA DHUPAD, AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, SINCE DECEASED BY LRS APPELLANTS NOS.1 & 2 WHO ARE ALREADY ON RECORD. ALL ARE R/O: BEHIND GRAM PANCHAYAT OFFICE SULEBHAVI, TQ: HUNGUND, DIST: BAGALAKOT – 587 118. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S. M. TONNE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RAMANGOUDA S/O. SAKKARAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KUNABENCHI, TQ: HUNGUND, DIST: BAGALAKOT – 587 118. 2. KARNATAKA STATE FINANCE CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL THASILDAR RANGE OFFICE, NEAR SANMAN HOTEL, COLLEGE ROAD BELAGAVI – 590 001. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.L.BATAKURI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF C.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AN DECREE DATED 22.04.2017 PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE BAGALKOT IN R.A.NO.7/2015 AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.07.2010 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BADAMI SITTING AT HUNGUND IN O.S.NO.27/2007 AND FURTHER SUIT O.S.NO.27/2007 MAY KINDLY BE DISMISSED BY ALLOWING THIS RSA WITH COSTS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8046 RSA No. 100738 of 2017 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL) Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal, which reads as under: “The undersigned appellants submit as under: It is respectfully submitted, that the appellants herein have settled the dispute in another proceedings i.e., R.A.No.33/2024 (Compromise decree copy is herewith enclosed) and hence the present appeal may kindly be disposed of withdrawn, in the interest of justice.” Memo is taken on record. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SH/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33