Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67541 (PNJ)

SITA DEVI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/32324/2025 · 2025-07-07

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

140 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32324-2025 Date of Decision:07.07.2025 Sita Devi …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Amaninder Preet, Advocate for the petitioner. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to transfer of investigation in a case arising out of FIR No.182, dated 22.09.2021, under Sections 120-B of IPC and Section 12,7,8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, registered at Police Station Jhansa, District Kurukshetra (Annexure P-1) to some independent Investigating Agency. A further prayer has been made to take strict legal action against the officials, who had colluded with the private respondents and had not taken action against the accused in the present case. 2. On advance notice, Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana, has appeared before this Court on behalf of official respondents and submits that in the present case, an untrace report was prepared, which was presented before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra on 28.01.2025. He further submits that now the petitioner/complainant has taken time for filing of protest petition and now, the case listed on 08.07.2025 for filing of protest petition. HITESH 2025.07.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-32324-2025 -2 Thus, the petitioner has the remedy for filing the protest petition before the concerned Court and the present petition is not maintainable, before this Court, at this stage. 3. Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a detailed protest petition before the concerned Court. 4. In case, any such protest petition is filed by the petitioner/complainant, the same shall be considered by the concerned Court, in accordance with law and it is expected that a reasoned order shall be passed by concerned Court. 5. With these observations, petition stands disposed of. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 07.07.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.07.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh