IBHAAN SERVICES LLP v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
WP(C)/621/2025 · 2025-10-14
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6753 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6753 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010019872025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/621/2025 IBHAAN SERVICES LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT, 2008 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 1 NO.
BALASIDDHI (CHOUDHURYPARA), P.O. AND P.S.-CHAYGAON, DIST- KAMRUP (R), ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS PARTNERS AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES VIZ. MRS. BHUSITA KALITA, D/O LATE HANGSHA DHAR KALITA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE GUWAHATI DR. B.K. KAKATI ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI ASSAM-781008 3:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KAMRUP GUWAHATI - BAIHATA ROAD KAMPUR TRIPTI NAGAR AMINGAON KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN-781031
Page No.# 2/3 4:OFFICER IN CHARGE CHHAYGAON POLICE STATION CHHAYGAON BAZAR CHHAYGAON ASSAM KAMRUP PIN-781124 5:NAREN CH SALOI S/O LATE RATNESWAR SALOI R/O VILL 1 NO. BALASIDDHI BHATAPARA NEAR TO KRD COLLEGE P.O. AND P.S.-CHAYGAON DIST- KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN-781124 6:GIRISH CH SALOI S/O LATE RATNESWAR SALOI R/O VILL 1 NO. BALASIDDHI BHATAPARA NEAR TO KRD COLLEGE P.O. AND P.S.-CHAYGAON DIST- KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN-78112 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K R BOROOAH, R SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MS. S YASMIN (R-5,6),MR. M SHARMA (R-5,6)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER 15.10.2025
Shri R. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to certain developments, the matter has become infructuous. Also heard Shri N. Das, learned State Counsel, Assam and Shri M. Sharma,
Page No.# 3/3
learned counsel for the respondent nos. 5 and 6. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant