- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28129 WP No. 12875 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 12875 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. SOMASHEKAR S/O SOME GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT TALAGAVADHI VILLAGE, KIRUGALU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. THYAGARAJA B., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT LAKSHMI G W/O SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 2. KUMARI TEJASHWINI S D/O SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 06 YEARS, BOTH R/A NO. 2451/9, 7TH B MAIN ROAD, RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560040 THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IS REP. BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT LAKSHMI (RESPONDENT NO. 1) …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS OF THE COURTS BELOW AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS ON IA-2 PASSED BY HONBLE I ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BANGALORE Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28129 WP No. 12875 of 2024 DATED 27/02/2024 IN C.MISC. NO. 915/2023 AND DISMISS THE IA- 2 AS PER ANNEXURE-A WITH COSTS AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the order dated 27.02.2024 passed in I.A.No.II in C.Misc.No.915/2023 by the I Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru whereby the Court had issued FLW for recovery of maintenance as ordered by the Court. This Writ Petition is filed on 06.05.2024. From 06.05.2024, the same is pending at the scrutiny stage for compliance of office objections. As the same is not complied with, the matter was posted before the Court on 22.07.2025. On that day, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' for today. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28129 WP No. 12875 of 2024 Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48